Canadian Underwriter
News

Spate of oil train derailments in Canada, US raising new alarms about safety

March 10, 2015   by Joan Lowy - THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


Print this page Share

WASHINGTON – Four trains hauling crude oil have derailed in Canada and the U.S. since mid-February, rupturing tank cars, spilling their contents, polluting waterways and igniting spectacular fires that burned for days.

The derailments have deepened safety concerns that if an oil-train accident were to occur in a populated area, the results could be disastrous.

“Recent incidents have proven once again that derailments of trains carrying this product are dangerous, and can be catastrophic,” said Sarah Feinberg, acting administrator of the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration.

A CN Rail train derailment near Gogama, Ont., is shown in this Sunday, March 8, 2015 handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO - Glenn Thibeault

The most recent incident saw 38 cars come off the tracks a few kilometres outside a northern Ontario community on Saturday. The resulting blaze was put out Monday, and two cars that were in the river were removed, the railway said.

It came just weeks after another freight train – 29 cars loaded with crude oil and petroleum distillates – derailed and caused a fire in the same area.

The Associated Press asked rail and hazardous materials safety experts about what is causing railway accidents and what can be done to stop them.

___

Where have derailments taken place?

The recent spate of accidents began Feb. 14 when a 100-car Canadian National Railway train hauling crude oil and petroleum distillates derailed in a remote part of Ontario, Canada.

Less than 48 hours later, a 109-car CSX oil train derailed and caught fire near Mount Carbon, West Virginia, leaking oil into a Kanawha River tributary and burning a house to its foundation.

On Thursday, 21 cars of a 105-car Burlington Northern-Santa Fe train hauling oil from the Bakken region of North Dakota derailed about five kilometres outside Galena, Illinois, a town of about 3,000 in the state’s northwest corner.

On Saturday, a 94-car CN crude oil train derailed five kilometres outside Gogama, south of Timmins, and destroyed a bridge. The accident was only 37 kilometres from the Feb. 14 derailment.

The worst such accident in recent years involved a runaway oil train that derailed in Lac-Megantic, Que., on July 6, 2013. The resulting explosions and fire killed 47 people and destroyed the town’s business district.

___

Why are there so many of these accidents?

The number of accidents is going up because the oil boom in Canada and the U.S. has dramatically increased the amount of oil shipped by rail. Last year, railroads moved 493,126 tank cars of crude oil, compared to 407,761 in 2013. That’s up from just 9,500 cars in 2008 before the hydraulic fracturing boom took off in the Bakken region of North Dakota, Montana and Canada, as well as other areas.

Most of the accidents in the U.S., as well as the Lac-Megantic derailment, involved trains hauling Bakken crude. Government tests show Bakken crude is more volatile than most crude oil. The American Petroleum Institute says Bakken is no more volatile than other light, sweet crudes.

___

What causes them?

Many factors can cause an accident, from too great a speed to operator fatigue. We won’t know the cause of the most recent ones until investigations are complete, but weather may be a factor. When it is very cold, as it has been across much of North America, steel rails and train car wheels can contract and become brittle. If the steel has a manufacturing flaw, no matter how small, it can spread rapidly in the cold weather.

“You get real cold weather like this and a rail can just snap … a wheel will shatter like a piece of glass,” said Ed Dobranetski, a former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board rail accidents investigator.

____

What is the government doing to prevent them?

Canadian and U.S. officials are working on new regulations to increase the safety of train operations and of the special tank cars that carry oil. Among other things, the proposal includes tank cars that have thicker shells and electronically controlled brakes that stop cars at the same time rather than sequentially.

“There will not be a silver bullet for solving this problem,” Feinberg said. “This situation calls for an all-of-the-above approach – one that addresses the product itself, the tank car it is being carried in, and the way the train is being operated.”

Canadian and U.S. officials are trying to co-ordinate changes because trains cross back and forth across the border. So far, there is no consensus on a timetable for phasing out older, less-safe tank cars.

Standards for Class 111 tanker cars – the ones involved in the Lac-Megantic derailment – were upgraded in the wake of the crash, but Canada’s Transportation Safety Board has said preliminary observations from the Feb. 14 derailment suggest the newer model “performs similarly” to the original.

___

What can railroads do to prevent accidents?

Brigham McCown, a former head of the U.S. federal agency that regulates rail transport of hazardous materials, said an array of new technologies patented within the last decade can warn of defects and identify trouble spots before accidents happen.

For example, sensors can be put on the lead locomotive to measure rail thickness, detect deformities and alert engineers, he said. Sensors can also be placed under track or next to rail ties to detect movement in track beds, or on cars to detect a broken wheel, he said.

___

Print this page Share

More News

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*