DAILY NEWS Mar 3, 2010 4:56 PM - 3 comments

New Ontario auto insurance regulations to take effect Sept. 1, 2010

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text

Regulations for Ontario's auto insurance reforms are now public, and will take effective on Sept. 1, 2010, the province's insurance regulator has announced.
The reforms include a new Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS) that will cap medical/rehabilitation and assessment/examination expenses for minor injuries at $3,500.
The new SABS also features a new Minor Injury Guideline for accidents.
A minor injury is defined under the new SABS as "a sprain, strain, whiplash associated disorder, contusion, abrasion, laceration or subluxation and any clinically associated sequelae." (Sequelae are symptoms arising as a result of any of the listed injuries.)
Reforms to the SABs will provide standard medical and rehabilitation coverage for non-catastrophic claims of $50,000, with optional coverage of $100,000 or $1.1 million.
The reforms will offer standard attendant care coverage for non-catastrophic claims of $36,000, with optional coverage of either $72,000 or $1.072 million.
For non-catastrophic claimants, insurers will supply optional caregiver, housekeeping and home maintenance benefits. Payment for in-home assessments will be available only to those claimants who have sustained more than a minor injury.
Assessments will be capped at $2,000. This applies to all assessments, be they requested by the claimant or the insurer. Rebuttal examinations will be eliminated, as will be a number of existing approval forms.
Several procedures will be simplified. For example, treatment plans and applications for approval of assessments or examinations will be merged into one process. And the rules governing claims processing will be simplified and consolidated.
Adjusters will have discretion in the use of insurer examinations.
The new SABS also contains a definition for "incurred expense".
The new SABs (Ontario Regulation 34/10) is available on e-laws at:
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2010/elaws_src_regs_r10034_e.htm



Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Bill

Lets face it, to many have tried to make a living from accidental injuries. I see cars constantly passing me on the right then cutting in front of me on the highways and city streets. My nerves are on end as this is totally illegal, but if I were to hit them from behind its my fault unless another car sees the incident in whole. Now we go to court and try to prove who was at fault costing insurance to rise at the price of legal fees. So why complain now when the insurance companies cars are on the road seeing nothing different than I. You should all be taking notes of plate numbers and reporting them rather than just passing by, because yes everyone pays in the end. The best one is when you have a accident and the other car files injury that due to mental and are unable to work. This is very hard to prove fraud as if the car were to stay home on government benefits and not go out till after the suit is done, the car wins. Mean while the paint was barely marked and lets face it, cars are made to take the impact in a accident, not like many years ago,the drivers did. Well I said how I feel thnxs

Posted June 29, 2010 11:11 PM


mrsirlou

from what i understand what is being considered a minor injury in some instances is in fact a fairly seriouse injury. Partial muscle tears of the shoulder and subluxations are not minor injury and may require extensive treatment and possibly surgery to repair or heal. I give it a few years and consumers will be screaming that they are being short changed especially since rates will continue to rise with less coverage. The innocent victims awaiting around the corner with surely be in for a rough ride should they be victim of this new so call accident benefit schedule here in Ontario!

Posted March 23, 2010 07:01 PM


David Outa

I personally feel the government should have first dealt with the main source of the inflated costs insurers incur when dealing with certain industries after an accident. Giving insureds the option to buy less coverage to save money could lead to bigger headaches for the industry.

Posted March 8, 2010 03:20 PM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Canadian Underwriter has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields