DAILY NEWS Feb 17, 2012 5:24 PM - 3 comments

B.C. Coroner study draws links between seat belt use and fatal crashes

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
2012-02-17

The B.C. Coroners Service has just completed a detailed study of fatal motor vehicle crashes in the Interior of the province, which shows a high proportion of those who died were not wearing seatbelts.

“Although numerous studies by the RCMP and Transport Canada show that at least 90% of British Columbians wear their seatbelts, the Coroners Service study showed that fewer than 60% of those who died were wearing them at the time they crashed,” the B.C. Coroners Service says in a press release.

The study analyzed 85 fatal vehicle crashes in the Interior region of B.C. in 2010. “Of the 85 cases, only 47% were wearing seatbelts at the time of the crash, 41% were definitely not, and seatbelt usage was unknown in 12% of the cases,” the release says.

Gender made little difference as to whether or not someone wore their seatbelt, the study found.

“Of the males who died, 45% were wearing seatbelts, and 41.5% were not wearing them, with seatbelt usage unknown for 13.5% per cent,” the Coroner’s Service observed. “Of the females who died, 50% were wearing them, and 41%, with usage unknown for 9%.”

The study also found that people who drink and drive tend not to wear seat belts.

“Persons involved in a crash in which the driver was impaired by alcohol or drugs were significantly less likely to have been wearing their seatbelt,” the release notes. “In cases in which impairment was a factor, only 25% of those who died had been wearing their seatbelts. Sixty-four per cent had not, and usage was unknown for 11%.

“But in cases in which impairment was not a factor, 58% were wearing their seatbelts, 30% were not, and usage was unknown in 12%.”

Finally, the study found tourists and people who did not live in the B.C. Interior were significantly more likely to have been wearing seatbelts than local residents.

“This mirrors the finding of many studies which show persons are more likely to wear seatbelts on lengthy trips, such as highway driving, than on short trips around their home communities,” the Coroners Service says.



Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Ian

What about seatbelt use vs. age of driver?

Posted February 22, 2012 05:11 PM


Trish Sanderson

A stat that I would be interested in is: of those individuals killed in a crash (with vs without seatbelts) what was the proximately from the crash site to their home or destination? The fact that your studies showed that more people wore their seatbelt when on longer trips, the opposite is no doubt true....the shorter the trip, the less likely a person was to wear a seatbelt. If the stats support this, maybe it is time to run ads to highlight this very fact. If we can encourage people to wear their seatbelts on short trips, it will very likely bring up all the numbers of those wearing them as it can become second nature if a person wears them more. Thanks!

Posted February 21, 2012 12:19 PM


Belts Areok

Very confusing data expression - why are all the numbers higher as deaths by those who were wearing seatbelts vs those who were not? If it is because the likelyhood of dying vs injury is greater, that should be stated. As expressed, the data indicates one is more likely to be dead if wearing a belt.

Posted February 21, 2012 10:37 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Canadian Underwriter has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields