DAILY NEWS Nov 28, 2012 4:39 PM - 5 comments

CCIR working group reaches no conclusion on controversial credit scoring issue

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: Harmeet Singh, Online Editor
2012-11-28

The Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators (CCIR) group tasked with reviewing the use of credit scoring by insurers has been unable to come up with recommendations on the matter, in perhaps a disappointing end to a long look at the issue.

CreditIn its November 2012 findings report, the Credit Scoring Working Group noted it had a “preponderance of opinion but a dearth of fact as to the actual and current, rather than potential, harms that may be accruing to consumers from the use of credit scores by insurers.”

Read more: Everyone in the insurance industry - including the broker sales force - has a role to play in educating consumers about the use of credit scoring: IBC

To reach a point where it could make recommendations, the group said market conduct reviews by various provincial regulators would be needed, and that’s beyond CCIR’s scope.

Because of that, the final word on the risks and harms associated with credit scoring (and what to do about it) now rests with policymakers, CCIR says.

The findings report is perhaps unsurprising. Last December, CCIR chairwoman Danielle Boulet said there would be no harmonized policy on the use of credit scores in underwriting.

"Ultimately, this is a government decision dependent upon a combination of political and socio-economic conditions within a jurisdiction, and a jurisdiction's level of tolerance in relation to any potential risk identified,” she said at that time.

Read more: Harmonized policy on the use of credit information in underwriting will not happen: CCIR

Brokers have generally been opposed to the use of credit scoring, because of inadequate consent and understanding among consumers about its use. Some insurers, on the other hand, have suggested that existing rules set out by the Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), mean further regulatory action isn’t required.

In June 2011, the group released an issues paper on the subject and sought response from the industry and consumer groups. In its current findings report, it noted that it had received a submissions from insurers, insurer organizations, brokerage organizations and credit bureaus.

Read more: Voluntary code on credit scoring not working: IBAO

No consumer groups, however, submitted a response to the issues paper, despite what the group said were its best efforts.

Results from consumer surveys completed by the Insurance Brokers Association of Ontario (IBAO) and Alberta’s Consumer Representative to the Automobile Rating Board (AIRB), were considered in its issues paper though, CCIR noted.

The Credit Scoring Working Group was created in 2009 to look at the issues and options around the use of credit scoring models in underwriting and other ways that insurers use data from credit rating agencies.

Monitor These Topics


Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Ted Harman

It is disappointing but not surprising that the group could not conclude their work with firm recommendations on the issue. Regulators tend to be averse to regulating entrenched processes that have been used for several uears. I am surprised by some of the comments however. With all the advertising that surrounds credit scores these days, it is surprising to think that consumers would not understand the effect of the score on their rating once it is explained to them. Better score, better rate. Seems like a simple enough equation.

Posted November 30, 2012 02:30 PM


Jeff Rice

I am not in favour of credit scoring and agree with the comments made by
Garth Merryweather and Georgia Hewson.
In addition, if the insurers who say they support the independent broker actually trusted us to be the front line underwriters they would not need to use Credit Scoring. The local broker usually has an idea of the clients who pose potential payment problems. This would be an advantage over the banks, and some direct writers who do no have such personal knowledge of their clients. If they did not have the use of credit scoring as an underwriting tool the insurers who support brokers would have an underwriting advantage.
I also question why credit scoring is regarded as reliable when it's calculation seems to be such a mystery. I have asked several bankers and none have been able to explain to me what factors go into a credit score and what the formula is to calculate the final number. All they know is the range that is good, bad or ugly.

Posted November 29, 2012 02:19 PM


Garth Merryweather

I have never been a fan of credit scoring as an underwriting tool. Yes, there is no doubt that claims frequency is affected when one selects only those with high credit scores. Frequency drops largely because those with money are less likely to bother with a small claim.

The agency network benefits if it also insures only those people who pay their bills on time and have low frequency of claims. Every one of us in the insurance business would love to have only customers who are wealthy and never miss a payment or make small claims. Less administration, higher premiums (because they own more property to insure meaning more commission) and no problems. Most of all - we get to sell them a lot of alternative products because they have the cash flow to purchase it and the need is greater. And they tend to be much more loyal towards the broker. The Pollyanna syndrom if you may.

The biggest problem that I see with this selection process - when a storm or event hits the lions share of the losses are actually disproportionate towards these wealthier clients. Yes they only had one claim but many of those claims are double, triple or more than the average claim. The very people who the insurance industry gave huge discounts to get them as customers now account for the highest dollar amount of claims by a large margin. Rather than recognizing this they tend to up the premium for all.

We are now witnessing a destablizing factor in the industry as a result of this activity. We see huge increases in premiums with the result of one storm. I beleive this occurs because we put too much weight on the type of client and we lean to far higher discounts to get them. Loss ratios are distorted by region and instead of recognizing the true cause we respond by increases in base premiums for all insureds, while leaving the discounts at the same levels for desired clients. We have gotten carried away with the whole process of selection. We fail to educate towns and cities on infrastructure planning to prevent the fast rising water claims. We fail to educate cities and towns on intersection planning to reduce collision claims. We fail to educate consumers to insist on materials that suffer far less loss due to weather related claims. This type of claims prevention is the answer to a lot of our claims problems but as a group we suck.

I guess I am old fashioned in the sense that I beleive there should be a reasonable amount of spread of risk. I do not beleive my clients really benefit from having to shop their insurance more often because some companies think they can influence overall profits by deselecting certain clients.

After all people just want a stable premium with stable coverage. We force them to shop every time we adjust these risk factors by region and it upsets the apple cart and forces customers to reevaluate their insurance coverage more often. And that does nothing for the insurance industry's reputation.

I fully realize that the internet has changed things for most agencies. Competition is good. Have loss ratios improved?

It is not surprising that IBC or any other group is devided on this because the entire industry is devided. It all depends on one's marketing plan.

Posted November 29, 2012 11:21 AM


Georgia Hewson

I have been in the insurance business for over 30 years and around insurance all my life. My clients are not happy with the credit score being used. Even the ones that benefit from it have family members that don't. We have all kinds of situations where we may not have any control over a credit problem. The hard working business start up that has to use there own credit to get started. A divorce where one person may control the bank account against another. Just because someone is going through a rough time does not prove they will be more likely to have a claim. I know people who are going through rough times for years and never do I see them putting a claim through. Why keep hitting the guy who is down with higher premiums. How about going back to the roots of insurance instead of all the fancy coverage that if you dare to claim it you get cancelled. How about larger minimum deductibles. There are lots of other ways to solve this rather then hit people on a personal level.Our US neighbors still don't have it together on Health Ins. I sure don't want to follow in their footsteps.

Posted November 29, 2012 10:36 AM


Thom. Young

Never has so much been done by so many for so long to achieve so little!

There is a preponderance of evidence that Credit Scoring as an underwriting variable works and that the public is becoming more and more familiar with the process and less and less concerned about it, at least those who receive a benefit from it seem to be as a majority in favour of it.

I'm reminded of the 10 year rule as it applies to the activities of our neighbours to the south, that being that Canada begins to adopt the business practices of our American friends after more or less 10 years of them becoming the norm there. This is clearly another example of that.

The CCIR has once again demonstrated its inability to put together a workable policy on a matter of concern to all Canadians. Perhaps they might want to reexamine their reason for existence.

Posted November 28, 2012 04:53 PM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Canadian Underwriter has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields