DAILY NEWS Nov 22, 2012 10:39 AM - 6 comments

Impaired driving-related deaths down in B.C. following tougher legislation: government

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
2012-11-22

The number of deaths related to impaired driving collisions in British Columbia has decreased over the past two years, following the introduction of tougher legislation, the provincial government announced this week.

Shirley BondSince the September 2010 launch of the immediate roadside prohibition (IRP) program, the number of alcohol-related motor vehicle deaths has decreased to an average of 62 a year, a decrease of 46% from the average of 114 over the previous five years, according to the province.

The numbers are based on preliminary road crash fatality data for the two years ending Sept. 30, 2012. The government made its announcement Wednesday, which marked the National Day of Remembrance for Road Crash Victims and Mothers Against Drunk Driving's 25th annual Project Red Ribbon.

The government’s goal upon creating the new law, which falls under the Motor Vehicle Act, was to reduce alcohol-impaired driving fatalities by 35 per cent by the end of 2013.

In the province, drivers impaired by alcohol face immediate penalties that may take away their vehicle, their licence, and cost them anywhere from $600 to more than $4,000 in administrative penalties and remedial program costs, according to the government.

The province has also had fewer impaired drivers on the road, according to a government-sponsored survey of drivers in Abbotsford, Kelowna, Prince George, Saanich and Vancouver.

The 2012 Roadside Alcohol and Drug Survey suggests that 44% fewer drivers had a blood-alcohol content (BAC) 0.05% and over. Nearly 60% fewer drivers were at or over the Criminal Code threshold of 0.08%, the survey suggests.

The results also suggest that levels of drinking and driving were the lowest recorded in the history of seven similar surveys conducted in Vancouver and Saanich, since 1995, the province noted.

PoliceMore than 82% of drivers said they were aware of the sanctions, according to the survey, and 30% said the new law prompted a change in their behaviour.

Drivers aged 25 to 54 were most likely to have changed their behaviour as a result of the legislation, while those under 25 were most likely to say they never drink and drive, according to the study.

The survey was independently conducted in June 2010 and June 2012 as part of an evaluation of the IRP legislation. It involved about 2,500 vehicles throughout the five communities, and involved collecting voluntary breath and mouth-fluid samples, and questioning participants about their awareness of and perspectives on B.C.'s approach to impaired driving.

Photos: Justice Minister and Attorney General Shirley Bond announced preliminary road-crash fatality data Wednesday. (Credit: Government of British Columbia) 

Monitor These Topics


Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Durward

The image of the public good for the sake of tyranny.
More people are killed in hospitals through medical error/mistakes/incompetence than were ever killed by drunk drivers and seat belts and air bags kill and injure more than they ever save from same.
It's all BS social engineering from folks who legally drink on the job on our dime and need the fines to pay for their lavish ways.
If any of them cared about road safety do you really think those that don't know the rules of the road or can even read the road signs would be issued licenses to drive? Would they purposely shut down one lane for miles in rush hr for one man doing a stationary job in a 6 ft area?
Get real, they own the insurance corp, the collect the fines, it's bureaucratic tyranny over the many for the benefit of the few.
How else you gonna pay those lavish public "servant" pensions?.
We are being hosed.

Posted November 22, 2012 11:01 PM


twcc

One problem. The legislation was ruled to be unconstitutional and struck down for 90 day suspensions. And there is a pending appeal seeking to reverse all of those suspensions and refund all of the fines and other financial consequences. There may be up to $73 million at stake. If it succeeds, the government will have a lot of explaining to do. And the consensus among lawyers who practice in the area is that the amended legislation is likewise unconstitutional and is currently being challenged in court. No-one wants drunk drivers back on the street and the apparent reduction in casualties is obviously a wondeful development but if the legislation is unconstitutional and therefore illegal,this will be a Pyrrhic victory. Is it asking too much for our government to enact laws which comply with the Constitution?

Posted November 22, 2012 10:50 PM


flatfoot77

I don't see the sky falling as predicted by business owners who figured they were going to loose their shirts because drivers would be staying away in droves for fear they couldn't smell a beer cap or wine cork before getting behind the wheel of a vehicle. Finally some laws with teeth and not gummed to death by an ineffective judicial system that is flawed with judges and lawyers. The public screamed they wanted enforcement and to get drinking drivers off the road and out from behind the wheel. Hope with the modifications to the rulings here in BC the law still has teeth.

Posted November 22, 2012 08:55 PM


Bill Barber

I think it bugs far more those who believe in the right to go about their lawful business without having to prove they are innocent of a crime. But then again maybe a police state is a good thing. What do I know? I'm only going by the history books.

Posted November 22, 2012 08:40 PM


Raifn

The death rate is the same or higher, it is just that more are not being caught.

Posted November 22, 2012 07:44 PM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Canadian Underwriter has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields