DAILY NEWS Feb 22, 2013 4:05 PM - 9 comments

NDP presses for auto premium reductions in Ontario budget

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: Greg Meckbach, Associate Editor
2013-02-22

The Ontario New Democratic Party continued Thursday to press the ruling minority Liberal provincial government to force insurance carriers to reduce personal auto premiums by 15%, while government members are focusing on implementing additional anti-fraud measures and the Insurance Bureau of Canada questions the NDP's math.

 Kathleen Wynne"So we're saying a 15% reduction," Gilles Bisson, NDP Member of Provincial Parliament for Timmins-James Bay, said Thursday in the legislature.

"The government, what are they saying? 'Oh, yeah. Let's do some more for those poor auto insurance companies. They're hurting so bad. Let's help them along. They need another break because they've got to make more money.'"

Bisson was referring to the government's pledge to implement the 38 recommendations of the Auto Insurance Anti-Fraud Task Force, which released its report late last year.

Background: Ontario anti-fraud task force calls for licensing clinics, greater power for FSCO in final report

"We're implementing the recommendations of the Auto Insurance Anti-Fraud Task Force," said Vic Dhillon, parliamentary assistant to consumer services minister Tracy MacCharles and MPP for Brampton West, in the legislature.

"New regulatory amendments being introduced will help prevent auto insurance fraud and protect consumers by requiring insurers to provide claimants with all reasons for denying a claim, giving claimants the right to receive bimonthly detailed statements of benefits paid out on their behalf, increasing the role of claimants in fraud prevention, making providers subject to sanctions for overcharging insurers for goods and services, and banning them from asking consumers to sign blank claim forms."

Andrea Horwath

But NDP leader Andrea Horwath said in the legislature Thursday that changes so far have resulted in "$2 billion in extra profits" to the insurance industry.

An NDP spokesperson told Canadian Underwriter Friday that figure is the reduction in accident benefit payments due to the insurance reforms introduced in September 2010, including the $3,500 cap on payments for injuries under the minor injury guideline.

Related: IBC says Ontario NDP's plan to reduce auto insurance rates "arbitrary"

Referring to figures from the General Insurance Statistical Agency (GISA), the NDP spokesperson added the loss ratio in Ontario dropped from 89 in 2010 to 65 in 2011. He was referring to GISA's "Earned Incurred Loss Ratio," which is the ratio of claims and adjustment expenses incurred to earned premiums. In that ratio, GISA includes expenses associated with servicing policyholders' claims but does not include other automobile insurance company operating expenses, such as marketing and general administration.

A spokesperson for IBC said Friday the Ontario auto insurance industry "lost an average of nearly a billion dollars a year between 2008 and 2010 on the auto product," including a $1.7 billion loss in 2010.

"We really question the NDP's math and we really need to put what they are saying into context," the spokesperson wrote in an e-mail to Canadian Underwriter. "Of the $233.2 million earned in profits in 2011, there were more than $10.3 billion in written premiums. Most of the money collected is returned back to claimants."

But Horwath suggested Thursday she wants the Liberal budget for 2013-14 to include measures to reduce premiums. Earlier this month, she had proposed that the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) be mandated to reduce auto premiums by 15% by March, 2014.

"The rubber hits the road in a budget, and in that budget I want to see affordability measures, particularly on auto insurance," Howath said, noting Tuesday’s Speech from the Throne only had "nice words" and nice promises."

"The day-to-day interests of people across Ontario must be addressed, and your government will strive to protect their privacy and their pocketbooks," the government said when opening the latest session of the legislature Feb. 19. "It will help this province's nine million drivers by continuing to implement the recommendations of the Auto Insurance Anti-Fraud Task Force, protecting individuals against fraud and working to reduce insurance rates across Ontario."

On Wednesday, NDP consumer services critic Jasmeet Singh asked Premier Kathleen Wynne whether the government plans "to give safe drivers in Ontario a break by actually ensuring that insurance rates in Ontario are cut." Wynne referred the question to Finance Minister Charles Sousa, who noted auto insurance claims are more expensive in Ontario than in other provinces.

"We have to get at that root cause," Sousa said during Question Period. "We can't make this a band-aid solution. We have to get at the issues, and I welcome your input to enable us to get at that resolve."

Singh, who represents the suburban Toronto riding of Bramalea-Gore-Malton, claimed that auto premiums have gone up, though Sousa said in 2012 they dropped by 0.2%.

"Some of the transformations we've put forward have already resulted in the stabilization of some of those rates, but more needs to be done," Sousa said.

In addition to the cap on minor injury benefits payments, the 2010 reforms also included a requirement for insurance firms to send benefits statement to claimants. It also reduced medical, rehabilitation and attendant care benefits in the standard auto policy (SAP) for non catastrophic injuries.

Before, standard auto policies were required to cover up to $100,000 in medical and rehab and up to $72,000 for attendant care. The SAP now requires up to $50,000 coverage for medical and rehab and $36,000 for attendant care. The income replacement under the SAP was reduced from 80 to 70% of income, though the maximum stayed at $400 a week. Under the current SAP, policyholders have the option to purchase additional income replacement of up to $1,000 week, and can purchase additional medical coverage.

Auto

Last November, the anti-fraud task force released recommendations on additional measures to reduce fraud, including:

-Legislative protection prohibiting reprisal or retribution against individuals who, in good faith, provide information about suspected fraud;

-Requiring the licensing of health clinics that treat and assess auto insurance claimants and give the Financial Services Commission of Ontario the power to regulate their business practices;

-Have FSCO create an" Auto Insurance Fraud Information Hotline" to let people report suspicious activity in the auto insurance;

-Allowing carriers to collect a cancellation fee for claimants who fail to attend a medical examination at the agreed time, without reasonable notice or explanation;

-Addressing the current backlog of mediation cases before FSCO;

-Ensuring that government-wide hiring constraints do not delay or prevent the FSCO from acquiring the necessary staff and expertise it requires to carry additional responsibilities recommended by the task force;

-Requiring claimants to confirm attendance at treatment facilities and receipt of goods and services billed to insurers;

-Requiring insurers to itemize the list of invoices they have received when they provide a benefit statement to a claimant every two months;

-Ensuring early assignment and continuity of crown attorneys in large complex auto insurance fraud prosecutions;

-Giving insurance carriers the power to examine a claimant under oath, where this is necessary to determine which insurer should be responsible for coverage, without prejudice to the right for an examination under oath;

-Treatment protocols for minor injuries that are based on scientific evidence;

-Amending the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule to make it clear that insurers are required to provide claimants with a full explanation when refusing to pay for treatment, assessment or other benefits;

-An Ontario-wide licensing scheme for the towing industry;

-Having insurers collect information about towing expenses to facilitate analysis of relationships between tow operators, collision repair facilities and health care clinics;

-Have the Ontario government ask the federal government to "move quickly to secure passage of amendments to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act that are now before the House of Commons in Bill C-12," with the goal of removing any undue limitations on the ability of insurers to pool claims information to combat fraud;

-Increase FSCO's powers to investigate and sanction unfair or deceptive acts or practices;

-Requiring the development of protocols for active information sharing about suspicious cases among the investigative divisions of FSCO, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and Ontario Health Insurance Plan;

-Develop protocols to permit FSCO investigators to exchange information with investigators from federal organizations such as the Canada Revenue Agency; and

-Clarifying the exemption for lawyers and paralegals in the unfair or deceptive acts or practices regulation so that it applies to lawyers and paralegals only when they are acting in a legal capacity.

Photos: Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne (left) and Ontario NDP leader Andrea Horwath (right) 

Monitor These Topics


Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Stephanie

It should actually be noted that Income Replacement was *changed* (not reduced) from 80% of a person's NET income, to 70% of a person's GROSS income. The new method actually increases the amount of benefits.

For instance, I make roughly $825/week gross. After taxes, about $660/week net.

80% of my net income would be $528.00. (OLD)
70% of my gross income would be $577.50. (NEW)

Either way, I would max out my benefits, but the point is, this was actually a change for the better, not for the worse.

Posted March 12, 2013 09:21 AM


Ray

@sam so if you have an accident that was purely weather related it would be considered an act of God and no-ones fault? So who pays then? , maybe God can fix your vehicle and pay for any treatment.

Posted March 6, 2013 11:20 AM


Sam

I am with NDP, Not only insurance premium should be reduced but also the record should be cleared after 3 or 4 years max of an at fault accident. There are a lot other rules that need to be looked into as accidents can happen, it can happen due to weather conditions too. Why is it considered my fault and am peanalized for rear ending some one who stops all of a sudden on a green light. If we pay everything to insurance companies what will we eat. I think if we the common man want, we all should put our insurance on hold or cancel and take public transport, that way the bus service will increase and improve and the insurance companies will learn a lesson that only they are not the reason we travel, but we can also use other means of transportation.

Posted March 1, 2013 07:37 PM


Jim Mulhern

Maybe the NDP should take over the BI & AB portion of the Ontario Auto Pollicy - then we would be back to 1985 Auto rates. That would be a nice auto premium decrease!

Posted February 25, 2013 08:23 AM


Claudio

It is true that the NDP suckered and payed the price for their actions regarding the auto insurance in Ontario. However, comparing the 1990's NDP to today is foolish. The people are not the same and neither is the situation. In fact, the political situation in Canada is so fluid that I don't consider the history of any party for a longer period then the existing or previous term. So who cares what the NDP did in the 90's; move and get a current life.

Will this reduction truly solve the root cause of what plagues our insurance in Ontario? Probably not; so what if it is a band-aid that won't cure. We need band-aids as well. They serve as a containment measure to deal with the problems we can't easily solve.

What is the ultimate goal? Is to have a sustainable industry that serves people and the Industry? Not sure; seems to me that auto insurance is needed because people are found financially at fault for compensation in "accidents". I have a moral problem with faulting an individual for a non-criminal act. I would change the legislation so as to no allow the recovery of any loss form any non-negligent party. If people want to insure themselfs, let them. What are my chances of convincing others? "0". Too many players have all of their existence in this scheme of getting, sorting, paying, ripping off, arguing for the usually exaggerated losses.

Doubt my opinions is popular here but I assure it would be with most Ontarians.

Posted February 24, 2013 04:57 PM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Canadian Underwriter has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields