November 10, 2016 by Greg Meckbach, Associate Editor
The insured loss from the wildfire in May in Fort McMurray, Alta. will be “somewhere between” $3.6 billion and $4.6 billion, with European reinsurers covering nearly half of the loss, analysts from A.M. Best Company Inc. suggested Thursday.
“The reinsurers are the ones shouldering a good portion of it,” Joel Silverthorn, senior financial analyst with Oldwick, N.J.-based A.M. Best, said in Toronto at the ratings firm’s annual Insurance Market Briefing Canada.
In May, 2016, a wildfire in Northern Alberta resulted in the evacuation of about 88,000 people, including the entire city of Fort McMurray.
During his presentation Thursday at the Sheraton Centre, across the road from Toronto City Hall, Silverthorn referred to two previously-released estimates of insured losses. One – at $3.58 billion – was released in July by Insurance Bureau of Canada and Catastrophe Indices and Quantification Inc. That was a preliminary estimate compiled by CatIQ, a sister firm to MSA Research Inc. In August, Verisk Analytics Inc.’s Property Claims Services unit published a bulletin pegging insured losses at an estimated $4.67 billion.
“My guess is by year end it will fall somewhere between the two,” Silverthorn said Thursday during the market briefing.
“The vast majority of the ultimate costs” of last May’s wildfire “will be borne by insurance policies of one variety or another,” IBC vice president Bill Adams said this past July.
At the time, Adams suggested that in early summer 2013, economic losses from floods affecting southern Alberta were about $6 billion but insured losses were only about $1.7 billion due in large part to a lack of residential overland flood coverage.
This makes Fort McMurray the largest insured loss so far in Canadian history. Before 2013, the second most expensive insured loss, at $700 million was the 2011 wildfire that affected Slave Lake, Alberta, Property and Casualty Insurance Compensation Corp. said at the time. Taking top spot at that time was the 1998 ice storm affecting Eastern Canada. Slave Lake has since been knocked to fifth place (with the 2013 Alberta flood, the 1998 ice storm and the July 8, 2013 Toronto area rain storm – which cost insurers about $1 billion – ranking second, third and fourth respectively).
“I think the industry has learned a lot from Slave Lake and had to take that and expand it into Fort McMurray,” Silverthorn said Thursday, suggesting the Fort McMurray disaster “was an unmodelled event.”
“They still have a long way to go to be able to really see what their exposures are,” to wildfire, Silverthorn added,
“This was an event no one expected,” Silverthorn said of Fort McMurray. “Afterwards, everyone said, ‘Well, yeah, of course it was going to happen,’ but did anyone think of it before that?”
Also speaking at the A.M. Best briefing was Susan Molineux, senior financial analyst specializing in reinsurance for Oldwick, N.J.-based A.M. Best.
One estimate was that about 85% of the insured loss from Fort McMurray was covered by reinsurance, she suggested. By comparison, Molineux noted, about 60% of the insured loss from New York City’s World Trade Center (destroyed Sept. 11, 2001 after Al Qaeda operatives flew two hijacked airplanes into the twin towers) was covered by reinsurance.
Of Fort McMurray, “the good news is that a lot of that burden was placed on the reinsurance market and in particular the global reinsurance market,” Molineux said Thursday.
Europe-based reinsurers are estimated to have covered “a little less than half of the loss” from Fort McMurray, with Bermuda-based reinsurers covering about 25%, Molineux suggested.
A.M. Best “has taken no ratings actions based on results from the Fort McMurray fire,” the company said in a Best Special Report – Canadian Review/Preview 2016 A Return to Sustainable Growth? A.M. Best suggested many of the “top” home and auto insurers writing in Alberta “have been able to absorb the losses without material impact to their risk-adjusted capital positions.” For smaller carriers writing in Alberta, “it may take more time to assess the extent of impact on profitability and capitalization measures.”
The combined ratio for the Canadian property & casualty insurance industry improved 2.9 points, from 98.5% in 2014 to 95.6% in 2015, A.M. Best said in the report.