Canadian Underwriter

Why insurers and brokers like Ontario’s budget

March 29, 2018   by David Gambrill

Print this page Share

Facing the distinct possibility of a political regime change in Ontario, the province’s auto insurers and brokers are calling on all of the province’s political parties to keep their eyes focused on auto insurance reform as the way to deliver low rates to consumers.

For Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), representing Canada’s home, auto and business insurers, that means non-partisan political support from all of the province’s parties to the principles contained in the Ontario government’s Fair Auto Insurance Plan.

“We’re pleased that the current government reaffirmed its commitment to transforming the auto insurance system by reiterating the measures contained in its Fair Auto Insurance Plan,” IBC said in a statement to Canadian Underwriter regarding the Liberals’ 2018 budget, announced yesterday.

In its budget, the Ontario Liberal government announced the date for establishing a new insurance and financial services regulator, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA), which will be operational by April 2019. Also, the government has adopted an industry recommendation to manage care of those who have suffered a catastrophic impairment as the result of a collision.

But the Liberal budget is in peril, based on recent political polling in advance of the provincial election scheduled for June 7, 2018. Recent polls indicate disaffected voters would consider electing an Ontario Conservative Party government led by Doug Ford if an election were to be held now.

Asked what risks or opportunities may exist for the industry if the provincial government changed (and the current budget was not passed), IBC said did not want to speculate on election outcomes.

“We are looking for all parties to commit to making Ontario’s auto insurance system work better for consumers,” IBC said. “We think the Fair Auto Insurance Plan is a good start.”

Announced by the Liberal government on Dec. 5, 2017, the Fair Auto Insurance Plan calls for auto insurance reforms in the following areas:

  • standard treatment plans
  • independent examination centres
  • establishment of a Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
  • risk factor review
  • lawyers’ contingency fees
  • a new provincial insurance and financial regulator, and
  • the creation of an expert panel.

The Insurance Brokers Association of Ontario (IBAO), Ontario’s broker association, also believed the industry as a whole is supportive of auto reform.

“The risk and opportunity for the industry [of a possible regime change] is the new government’s focus on this objective [and] not becoming distracted by the current issue of the day, for example territorial rating,” said IBAO CEO Colin Simpson.

The PCs under Doug Ford show significant 905-area support, published polls indicate, and some of these areas of the province, such as Brampton, Vaughan, and Mississauga, have historically seen higher insurance rates.

Ford has not returned requests by Canadian Underwriter to clarify his position on auto insurance reforms. But a number of comments made to Canadian Underwriter by PC party members in the recent past indicate support for a review, if not abolition, of territorial ratings used by auto insurers.

“Geographic discrimination should be eliminated while not raising rates on other parts of the province,” a spokesperson for PC finance critic Vic Fedeli told Canadian Underwriter in December.

The Ontario NDP, when contacted in December 2017, declined to comment on its auto insurance platform.

The Liberal government’s Fair Auto Insurance Plan is based on certain recommendations contained in David Marshall’s April 2017 report, Fair Benefits Fairly Delivered. In his report, Marshall, a special advisor to Liberal Finance Minister Charles Sousa, made 35 recommendations to change the province’s auto insurance system.

Print this page Share

2 Comments » for Why insurers and brokers like Ontario’s budget
  1. Stan Campbell says:

    History is filled with stories of governments that attempt to “make things fair”. Be very afraid.

  2. Frank Cain says:

    Years from now there will be some serious introspection as to why the Ontario Auto policy was used to cover the driver and related others injured as a result of the use of the vehicle. 70 years ago, the Ontario auto policy covered Medical Payments for a limit of $1,000 to cover the costs of first aid. It was seldom used.

    The main purpose of the policy is to meet the Government’s manifesto that the vehicle is on the road with insurance for no less than minimum third party Liability. The rest are mandatory throw-ins that have succeeded in crippling the ability of the insurance to make it work.

    Is this possibly the reason why injuries related to home ownership are not covered under a residential policy i.e. fire, a fall down stairs, falling off a ladder while cleaning out an eavestrough, etc because it would have the same damaging effect under this mode of insurance?

    Perhaps the things that happened 70 years ago were not all that bad.

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *