Canadian Underwriter

Keyword
D&O


News InsuranceLegalMergers and AqcuisitionsTechnology

Pen Underwriting Canada’s e-traded D&O solution offers brokers fast quote-to-cover capability

July 22, 2016 by Canadian Underwriter

Pen Underwriting Canada’s newly launched e-trading platform allows brokers to quote and issue a policy within five minutes that provides directors and officers a broad range of D&O coverage to suit the fast-evolving risks and liabilities they face. Calling the

News InsuranceLegalLegislation / RegulationMergers and AqcuisitionsProfessional Development

Corporate investigations on the rise, study suggests

May 24, 2016 by Canadian Underwriter

Corporate investigations are on the rise, with over a quarter (27%) of businesses saying they have experienced a claim or investigation involving a director of their company in the past year, up from one in five in 2014. That was

News InsuranceLegalMergers and Aqcuisitions

Supreme Court of Canada will not hear appeal of disputed $15-million D&O liability claim from Onex

April 18, 2016 by Canadian Underwriter

For the second time in 18 months, the Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear an appeal of a verdict of an Ontario lawsuit arising from a disputed US$15-million directors’ and officers’ liability claim arising from an unjust enrichment

News Earnings / RatingsInsuranceLegalMarkets / CoveragesMergers and Aqcuisitions

U.S. D&O insurance pricing pressure to dampen performance: Fitch

April 13, 2016 by Canadian Underwriter

Market conditions are evolving in the directors’ and officers’ (D&O) liability insurance market in the United States, with merger and acquisition activity in 2015 facilitating greater market concentration, according to a new report from Fitch Ratings. The report, titled U.S.

News InsuranceLegalMergers and Aqcuisitions

Oppression remedy lawsuit against corporate directors reaches Supreme Court of Canada

April 10, 2016 by Canadian Underwriter

The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday it will hear an appeal of a lawsuit in which two corporate directors were ordered to pay more than $600,000 to a former chief executive officer who brought an oppression remedy action under