Canadian Underwriter

Bill proposing nation-wide regulation of electronic cigarettes referred to Senate committee

March 17, 2017   by Canadian Underwriter

Print this page Share

A committee of Canada’s Senate plans to study proposed legislation that, if passed into law, would regulate electronic cigarettes under the federal Tobacco Act.

Currently, “all regulation of e-cigarettes takes place at the provincial or municipal level,” Quebec Conservative Senator Judith Seidman told the Senate last week. “Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, Northwest Territories and Yukon have no regulation at all. Nova Scotia, one of the first provinces to implement significant restrictions on e-cigarette sales in Canada, passed legislation that treated e-cigarettes as conventional tobacco cigarettes in May 2015. New Brunswick passed similar legislation to Nova Scotia.”

She made her comments during second reading of Bill S-5, which was referred March 9 to the Senate social affairs, science and technology committee.

If passed into law, Bill S-5 will make changes to the Non-smokers’ Health Act and the Tobacco Act.

In August, 2014, Toronto City Council voted to ban e-cigarettes at City of Toronto workplaces.

Also in 2014, Swiss Re Ltd. warned that if electronic cigarettes “are proven to be more harmful to health than presumed today, respiratory diseases or other health problems may increase and trigger liability claims similar to tobacco claims in the past.

Ontario, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, British Columbia and Alberta “have very basic restrictions that relate solely to the location of use of e- cigarettes and restrict them as in conventional tobacco cigarettes,” Seidman told the Senate March 9, 2017.

“There are differing opinions in Canada about what to do at this particular juncture: regulate, ignore and wait for more evidence about the product, or ban the e-cigarette all together,” Seidman added.

“Second-hand exposure to vapour from e-cigarettes has been tested to some extent and is found to be less toxic than cigarette smoke as it does not contain carbon monoxide or volatile organic compounds,” she reported. “However, the vapour does produce a measurable absorption of nicotine in bystanders, and how to measure that risk is not yet clear. All reviews of second-hand exposure have called for more testing to clarify the conflicting findings on the emissions of particulate matter, metals and other substances.”

In a 2014 report, Swiss Re SONAR: Emerging Risk Insights, the reinsurer said risks of electronic cigarettes include e-liquids, which when “ingested or absorbed through the skin, they can cause vomiting and seizures and can even be lethal.”

Electronic cigarettes “may include variable levels of cancer-causing chemicals and harmful ingredients,” Dr. David McKeown, then Toronto’s Medical Officer of Health, wrote in 2014. Those ingredients include tobacco-specific nitrosamines, carbonyl compounds, such as aldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein, Dr. McKeown said at the time.

“Unlike conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes have been marketed through television, the Internet and print advertisements to promote a lifestyle as well as their use as a healthier alternative to tobacco smoking, for smoking cessation, and to reduce cigarette consumption,” Seidman told the Senate earlier this month. “However, there is insufficient evidence to support such premises, and even less evidence about the risks of exposure in long-term use.”

Print this page Share

2 Comments » for Bill proposing nation-wide regulation of electronic cigarettes referred to Senate committee
  1. Linda Erickson says:

    Common sense tells me vaping is much less risky, than the conventional cigarette, or the mind altering drugs, pharma has introduced for smoking cessation. I do believe there should be age restriction, and tamper evident containers, warning labels on eliquid, all of which this industry, has already introduced, and for the most part, have followed. There should be restrictions on where vaping is allowed, because non vapers should not be subjected to unwelcomed odours produced by vapers, while enjoying their break from work, even though these smells are much nicer than cigarette smoke, and dissipate much quicker

  2. Kathleen Geoghegan says:

    I have been vaping over 7 years now after switching from smoking 3 packs a day. I can say that my lungs are in much better shape than they were.
    Science as shown that they are far less harmful than smoking and for sure a Harm Reduction Tool for smokers which is long overdue. The alternative quit smoking tools from Pharmaceutical Companies have far more “chemicals” than what is in Vaping E Liquids. Nothing in life is totally safe even breathing the air while walking around town. Smokers need an option that they can tune it to what they need and vaping does that.
    Any government regulation should factor in the users and how it is helping them quit smoking (Something we have been told for so many years that we must do) – so are they saying we must do it there way? I quit smoking over 7 years ago …Didn’t need the help of drug companies or the government. This is what you wanted ………smokers to quit. Go lightly on regulations – help the smokers as millions of them will die if not get any help.

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *