Georgian Claim Services Inc. has a unique commitment to quality that transcends the traditional employer- employee relationship.
A recent ruling by the Court of Appeal for Ontario includes some interesting observations with regard to how to address what constitutes a multi-causal loss and how the pollution exclusion in a property policy should be interpreted.
Bitcoin is not a recognized currency and is not backed by any principal authority. Still, thousands of firms use the payment system launched in 2009, opening the door to discussions about how clients using bitcoin should best provide security for the storage and transfer of funds.
Ensuring that coverage is available when it is needed most – when there is a claim – requires careful consideration of both Errors and Omissions (E&O) and Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies beforehand. What E&O and CGL policies cover separately and in conjunction with each other can make all the difference.
Ontario Court of Appeal fails to clarify the duty to defend an additional insured.
A single related claim must involve analysis of specific facts around each allegation and cause of action.
1 Commercial insurance brokerage Nacora Canada announced in August the appointment of Dianna Fioravanti [1] as its new chief executive officer and managing director. Fioravanti was previously senior vice president of national sales and business development, for SCM Risk Management…
CANADIAN MARKET SCM buys Granite Global Solutions SCM Insurance Services has acquired the property and casualty businesses of Granite Global Solutions. The terms of the deal were not disclosed. The businesses acquired include Granite Claims Solutions, a national adjusting firm;…
A review of recent legal cases shows some interesting developments involving property insurance claims.
How this legal doctrine impacts the sharing of defence costs between primary and excess insurers.
From manual processes to the virtual world, the claims environment has experienced dramatic changes
A recent Ontario court decision addressing allocation of plaintiffs’ costs notes that, in some circumstances, it may be equitable to allocate costs on an equal footing. But if insurers are not prudent in their attempts to limit potential exposure, courts could opt to allocate costs on a proportionate basis.