Canadian Underwriter

Is Aviva-Desjardins fraud collaboration the dawning of a new era?

March 19, 2019   by Jason Contant

Print this page Share

Could an insurance fraud collaboration between the second and third largest insurers in Canada herald the beginning of a broader trend across the industry?

“Hopefully, this is laying the foundation for great, big things to come,” said Ashish Bhargava, vice president of fraud and analytics at Aviva Canada, in an interview with Canadian Underwriter Monday. “I think across a lot of major insurers, we have strong experience sets dealing with particular types of fraud issues and bringing a lot of that experience together could be incredibly fruitful and incredibly powerful.”

John Bordignon, a spokesperson for Desjardins Insurance, the country’s third-largest insurer by market share, also hopes there will be more collaboration between insurers on fraud. “Insurers are increasingly collaborating to identify and investigate fraud, and it needs to continue,” he said.

The joint investigation between the insurers followed a vehicle collision in March 2018. After the accident, Desjardins determined the policy number and liability slips were not valid. The victim provided Desjardins information about the person who allegedly sold her fake pink slips from The Personal, part of Desjardins.

The so-called “ghost broker” who sold the fraudulent insurance has been charged with two counts of fraud under $5,000 and two counts of providing false documentation.

“During the investigation, we determined that Aviva had investigated the same individual several years earlier for the unlicensed sale of insurance products,” Bordignon said. “It was then we decided to act collaboratively with Aviva on a broader investigation.”

Aviva confirmed they carried out an investigation into the accused individual in November 2014, making it the second time in several years he has been investigated. “Yet he continues to act as an unlicensed intermediary, supplying false documentation of policies, leaving the general public and insurance companies at risk.”

For Desjardins, the joint investigation helps raise awareness and educate the public about fraud. The goal is to ensure that consumers are working with reputable (and licensed) agents or brokers, thereby protecting them from becoming victims.

What are some of the challenges when it comes to partnering with other insurers on fraud investigations?

Sometimes insurers may not feel comfortable sharing data with others. “That’s something we need to continue to work through, and we understand it’s a sensitive topic,” Bhargava said. He added there needs to be a “bias for action,” which can help overcome things like a deficit of resources or expertise within an organization to investigate fraud. “To me, this is an investigation highlighting that when we do work together, we can produce some positive results.”

To detect fraudulent activity affecting multiple insurers, there should be a framework in place that allows insurers to share information for the purposes of fraud detection, investigation and suppression, Bordignon said. “This alignment needs to encapsulate regulators, law enforcement and the insurance industry, because we all have a role to play in fighting fraud. Tackling insurance fraud takes a combined effort, no single organization can solve it.”

Print this page Share

2 Comments » for Is Aviva-Desjardins fraud collaboration the dawning of a new era?
  1. IA says:

    Nothing will change as long as brokers and insurance companies don’t demand tougher sentences for insureds committing fraud and the many companies that contribute to those fraudulent losses. Yes, the towing or auto shop or restoration company looses their preferred vendor contract or might get fined but they are still in business. Same with paralegals, chiropractors etc. they are still doing business, they retain their licenses or may have short suspensions. There is no real consequences that deter that kind of behavior. I don’t think that it would completely disappear as crooks unfortunately can get very creative but it can be curved down so that not everyone is penalized by what others do. Clients are getting tired of the same song and dance – why does everyone have to pay for the bad apples

    • SN says:

      Had this investigation been done properly, in concert with the police, using undercover officers rather than private investigators, and the media release done at the conclusion of the court process, it would have gone a long way in having the police and the courts take the industry’s concerns seriously. As it stands it’s a fluff piece of advertising for two companies. Nothing to see here…

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *