Canadian Underwriter
Feature

U.S. Insurers’ Reserve Deficiency Hits US$67 Billion


October 1, 2004   by Canadian Underwriter


Print this page Share

Despite moves by several companies to bolster reserves over the past three years, the property and casualty insurance industry remains under-reserved to the tune of US$67 billion, according to rating agency A.M. Best. In a special report, the rater says reserve adequacy remains a key issue in ratings, with adverse reserve development the number-one cause of insurer insolvency.

For casualty-oriented insurers, where carried reserves may be four or five times the size of policyholder surplus, a 25% reserve deficiency will render the company technically insolvent,” the report notes. Of the total reserve deficiency, which represents 19% of the industry’s policyholder surplus, A.M. Best estimates that the bulk of this (about US$38.5 billion) relates to asbestos and environmental (A&E) losses. This reserve inadequacy exists despite insurers having topped up A&E reserves by about US$47 billion over the past three years.

By the 2003 yearend, loss and loss adjustment expense (LAE) reserves represent about 54% of the industry’s total liabilities, the rating agency notes. Total loss and LAE reserves were US$445.4 billion at this point, of which just US$30 billion (or 7%) had been set aside for A&E losses. However, this still represents significant growth in reserves – while total reserves were up 6.2% in 2002 and 7.8% in 2003, A&E reserves grew 20% in 2002 and 9% in 2003. “As the industry’s reserve deficiency remains quite large, and despite the reserve charges in recent years, A.M. Best expects continued adverse reserve development in the near to mid-term, particularly in the commercial lines and reinsurance segments,” the report says. As well, several insurers are in the process of reviewing A&E claims. “While market conditions generally have hardened for most lines of business, future reserve charges may severely impact the balance-sheets and operating performance of some carriers. If unexpected, such charges would result in ratings pressure and downgrades.”


Print this page Share

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*