How insurers respond to proposed ban on territorial ratings
October 16, 2018 by Greg Meckbach
Print this page Share
Calls this week for a ban on territorial ratings in auto insurance, by politicians from across the political spectrum, shows that Ontario needs to change its rate filing system, an Insurance Bureau of Canada spokesperson said.
Bill 42, the Ending Discrimination in Automobile Insurance Act, was tabled Monday for first reading.
If passed into law, insurers would no longer be allowed to use “factors primarily related to the postal code or telephone area code” to set auto insurance rates.
It is too early for IBC to take a position one way or another on that bill. IBC plans to go over the bill with insurance carriers who are IBC’s members, said Pete Karageorgos, IBC’s director of consumer and industry relations for Ontario.
Bill 42 would “end the unfair practice of discriminating against drivers simply based on where they live,” Finance Minister Vic Fedeli said Monday during Question Period.
Fedeli did not say whether he actually supports Bill 42, a private member’s bill tabled by Parm Gill, a backbench Progressive Conservative MPP representing the riding of Milton.
Private members’ bills are often defeated, even when the MPP introducing the bill is from the government side of the house.
Auto claims statistics show there is a higher frequency of auto accidents in urban areas than in rural areas, Karageorgos said.
But the industry has been getting pushback from consumers in places like Brampton, where auto rates tend to be higher.
The MPP for Bramalea Gore Malton is Gurratan Singh, the New Democratic Party’s auto insurance critic.
Singh said this week he plans to bring in a private member’s bill proposing that the Greater Toronto Area be considered one territory for the purpose of setting auto insurance rates. Singh did not respond to a request for comment from Canadian Underwriter.
It is significant that one MPP each from the PC and NDP parties took issue this week with territory-based rating factors, Karageorgos said.
“MPPs recognize that regulations are outdated they need to be modernized,” Karageorgos said Tuesday in an interview.
When an insurer applies for a rate change with FSCO, it can take several months to get a response from the regulator, and it should not take that long, Karageorgos contended.
Singh told the legislature earlier he can give “numerous examples” of motorists whose rates dropped by as much as 50% when they moved from his riding to an area other than Brampton.
Karageorgos said Brampton has both a higher frequency and higher severity of auto insurance claims across the industry.
Print this page Share
Why should folks like myself, that chose to specifically live in areas that reflect lower losses have to pay increased premiums to subsidize statistically proven areas that are known to have many more claims than the average expected?
Brampton car insurance rates are sky high every year and more expensive for the next years! The good drivers should not suffer for the drivers who drive irresponsibly, causing multiple accidents. It is not fair that good drivers also be penalized because of this situation! Penalize the drivers that cause accidents, not the good drivers!
I agree 100%. I have never had any at fault accidents or convictions yet pay almost $200 in car insurance monthly with a clean record of approximately 16 years. I drive a 2007 Mazda. This is absurd and needs to change sooner than later. It is beyond unfair and frustrating!