Canadian Underwriter

Insurers jumping out of the trampoline business

July 8, 2018   by Jason Contant

Print this page Share

Canadian insurers are jumping out of the trampoline business.

Gina Bennett, vice president of Markel Canada’s western region, told Canadian Underwriter Thursday that there are few markets to approach for trampoline risks, as most sports insurance carriers have exited writing this class. Bennett is the former president of Allsport Insurance, a managing general agent (MGA) that was fully acquired by Markel in April 2017.

Contributing factors include several catastrophic injuries and deaths in the last few years – primarily at trampoline park facilities, but also through provincial gymnastics associations. “Underwriters are not willing to take on the severe and frequent losses of this activity,” said Bennett.

In fact, some carriers are exiting writing sports insurance altogether. “We are seeing the market harden in some classes or outright change of appetite for some carriers,” Bennett said.

Insurance for inflatable equipment such as bouncy castles is also showing signs of market hardening. In one case in the United Kingdom, a three-year-old girl died while jumping on a bouncy castle with a trampoline. The trampoline exploded and launched her 30 feet into the air.

“We see deaths and severe injuries from these devices throughout the world,” said Bennett. “We pay attention to this when underwriting these exposures.”

Gary Hirst, president and CEO of the managing general agent CHES Special Risk Inc., told Canadian Underwriter earlier this year that he has also seen evidence of market hardening (higher rates and less available coverage) in certain areas of Canada’s commercial insurance marketplace – including liability-type risks.

“Insuring anything that’s got a trampoline in it seems to be incredibly difficult at the moment,” Hirst said. “It’s mainly down to frequency and size of losses that have occurred over a very long time, but certainly running up to Christmas last year, there were a couple of really bad claims, which has almost dried up capacity for trampoline risk.”

Trampolines are a very specific risk contained within the broader category of sports and recreation insurance. In general, the sports insurance market is hardening in certain classes and coverages due to increased number of claims, Bennett said.

Print this page Share

2 Comments » for Insurers jumping out of the trampoline business
  1. Jim Henry says:

    This is anecdotal but on point. Yesterday, July 11, I was at the St. Catharines General Hospital for a minor procedure. While waiting, I was seated close to a couple of Moms with their small daughters. The little girls both had broken legs and were there for an orthopedic clinic.

    Apparently both girls suffered their injuries at a local trampoline park. The Moms were discussing how many of their friends had kids who were injured at the same place. A couple of the injuries were described as quite serious. Inevitably, the conversation turned to suing and what lawyers to contact, how big a settlement that somebody, who knew somebody, had got and so on.

    My name was called and I walked away thinking about what underwriter, in their right mind, would insure such a terrible risk. An activity that is a) inherently dangerous, b) is attractive to children and c) is impossible to risk manage properly and still remain attractive to the public.

    A classic case of underwriters allowing the perfume of the premium to disguise the stink of the risk!

  2. Chris Kent says:

    I have successfully operated a “Bungee Trampoline” business for 20 years without a claim. It seems the insurance industry is clumping this activity with trampoline parks which is entirely wrong. Unprotected trampolines (as in a trampoline park) have inherent risks Bungee Trampolines do not. the words Bungee and Trampoline alone are, understandably, a concern. put together they mean safety. Bungees protect a trampoline rider from the danger of the lone trampoline. My business is being denied coverage right now which means I may not be able to make a living this year (especially due to the fact I was not informed until only last week and my business starts in a month). I wish and hope the insurance world can differentiate the 2 activities as they hold completely different risk profiles.

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *