Canadian Underwriter

Claims professionals speak out amid allegations of contractors providing insurance advice

June 21, 2018   by Jason Contant

Print this page Share

Ontario and Quebec’s May 4 windstorm event has the Canadian claims industry talking about the proper roles of contractors and adjusters, based on unconfirmed reports that individual rogue contractors – e.g. not people associated with the larger restoration contracting firms – may have allegedly offered opinions to policyholders about insurance coverage in the wake of the storm.

When a catastrophe hits, many different resources are needed to assess the damage and adjust the loss, including contractors and insurance adjusters (both independent and those employed by insurance companies). Each comes with their own training and skill sets, as well as restrictions on what they are able to do. For example, contractors are usually local and can get to a scene faster than anybody else, making them highly used on water claims.

“The downside to that is he’s not an adjuster,” Skip McHardy, director of catastrophe response (Canada) with Catastrophe Response Unit Inc., told Canadian Underwriter in an interview last week. “He can’t talk about policy, deductible, coverage, actual cash value or sublimits – all of the things only an adjuster can legally discuss with an insured.”

Lorri Frederick, president of independent adjusting firm ClaimsPro, said that while contractors can see if there are shingles lifted or if an aperture has been created on the roof, “there is a fine line” between quantifying damages and assessing coverage.

“If you start giving claims advice, or if you are specifically speaking to coverage, it’s really a bit of a grey area – probably a little bit less than grey,” Frederick said. “Are you [as a contractor] acting in the capacity of an adjuster if you start speaking to coverage?”

During the May 4 windstorm, which caused an estimated $410 million in insured losses, some adjusting firms brought in people from the United States to handle a surge in claims as part of their business model.

McHardy notes that a person in the United States can take a 40-hour class, pass a state test and become a “property adjuster” without having to learn auto insurance, for example, or how to identify the cause of a loss or whether it is covered. A Canadian insurance adjuster “is actually a much more educated, well-rounded insurance professional,” he added.

To be a Level 1 adjuster in Canada, a person has to have a good working knowledge of auto, medical liability, property, commercial, and errors and omissions – “all of the nuances of insurance,” McHardy said. They must also pass a rigorous test and attend a lot of classes to obtain a Level 1 adjuster designation.

But a typical Canadian adjuster does not usually write a damage estimate, which is the role of the contractor. There can also be a “remarkable” difference in indemnity amounts depending on whether a contractor, staff adjuster or independent adjuster writes the estimate, McHardy said.


Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to clarify that the allegations relate to the unconfirmed activities of individual rogue contractors. More coverage is available in the article Contractors know their role: Restoration contracting firms speak out that clarifies the position of restoration contracting firms. 

Print this page Share

1 Comment » for Claims professionals speak out amid allegations of contractors providing insurance advice
  1. al.dobson says:

    Maybe if the insurer or adjuster did not ask the contractor to “investigate and report” each claim, instead of sending their people out (to save money!),
    the insured would not have to ask if there is coverage!

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *